Problem
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums
and an integer k
.
Return **an integer that denotes the *sum* of elements in nums
whose corresponding indices have **exactly** *k
* set bits in their binary representation.**
The set bits in an integer are the 1
's present when it is written in binary.
- For example, the binary representation of
21
is10101
, which has3
set bits.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [5,10,1,5,2], k = 1
Output: 13
Explanation: The binary representation of the indices are:
0 = 0002
1 = 0012
2 = 0102
3 = 0112
4 = 1002
Indices 1, 2, and 4 have k = 1 set bits in their binary representation.
Hence, the answer is nums[1] + nums[2] + nums[4] = 13.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [4,3,2,1], k = 2
Output: 1
Explanation: The binary representation of the indices are:
0 = 002
1 = 012
2 = 102
3 = 112
Only index 3 has k = 2 set bits in its binary representation.
Hence, the answer is nums[3] = 1.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1000
1 <= nums[i] <= 105
0 <= k <= 10
Solution (Java)
class Solution {
public int sumIndicesWithKSetBits(List<Integer> nums, int k) {
int sum = 0;
for(int i=0; i<nums.size(); i++){
if(getBitCount(i) == k){
sum += nums.get(i);
}
}
return sum;
}
// If u don't want to use inbuilt method then Build ur Own
int getBitCount(int number){
int bitCount = 0;
while (number > 0) {
if (number % 2 == 1) {
bitCount++;
}
number /= 2 ;
}
return bitCount;
}
}
Explain:
nope.
Complexity:
- Time complexity : O(n).
- Space complexity : O(n).