969. Pancake Sorting

Difficulty:
Related Topics:
Similar Questions:

    Problem

    Given an array of integers arr, sort the array by performing a series of pancake flips.

    In one pancake flip we do the following steps:

    For example, if arr = [3,2,1,4] and we performed a pancake flip choosing k = 3, we reverse the sub-array [3,2,1], so arr = [1,2,3,4] after the pancake flip at k = 3.

    Return **an array of the *k*-values corresponding to a sequence of pancake flips that sort **arr. Any valid answer that sorts the array within 10 * arr.length flips will be judged as correct.

      Example 1:

    Input: arr = [3,2,4,1]
    Output: [4,2,4,3]
    Explanation: 
    We perform 4 pancake flips, with k values 4, 2, 4, and 3.
    Starting state: arr = [3, 2, 4, 1]
    After 1st flip (k = 4): arr = [1, 4, 2, 3]
    After 2nd flip (k = 2): arr = [4, 1, 2, 3]
    After 3rd flip (k = 4): arr = [3, 2, 1, 4]
    After 4th flip (k = 3): arr = [1, 2, 3, 4], which is sorted.
    

    Example 2:

    Input: arr = [1,2,3]
    Output: []
    Explanation: The input is already sorted, so there is no need to flip anything.
    Note that other answers, such as [3, 3], would also be accepted.
    

      Constraints:

    Solution (Java)

    class Solution {
        public List<Integer> pancakeSort(int[] arr) {
            List<Integer> result = new ArrayList<>();
            for (int i = arr.length; i >= 1; i--) {
                int max = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
                int index = 0;
                for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
                    if (max < arr[j]) {
                        index = j + 1;
                        max = arr[j];
                    }
                }
                result.add(index);
                reverse(arr, index - 1);
                result.add(i);
                reverse(arr, i - 1);
            }
            return result;
        }
    
        private void reverse(int[] arr, int index) {
            for (int i = 0; i <= (index - 1) / 2; i++) {
                int temp = arr[i];
                arr[i] = arr[index - i];
                arr[index - i] = temp;
            }
        }
    }
    

    Explain:

    nope.

    Complexity: