1431. Kids With the Greatest Number of Candies

Difficulty:
Related Topics:
Similar Questions:

    Problem

    There are n kids with candies. You are given an integer array candies, where each candies[i] represents the number of candies the ith kid has, and an integer extraCandies, denoting the number of extra candies that you have.

    Return **a boolean array *result* of length n, where result[i] is true if, after giving the ith kid all the extraCandies, they will have the greatest number of candies among all the kids****, or *false* otherwise**.

    Note that multiple kids can have the greatest number of candies.

      Example 1:

    Input: candies = [2,3,5,1,3], extraCandies = 3
    Output: [true,true,true,false,true] 
    Explanation: If you give all extraCandies to:
    - Kid 1, they will have 2 + 3 = 5 candies, which is the greatest among the kids.
    - Kid 2, they will have 3 + 3 = 6 candies, which is the greatest among the kids.
    - Kid 3, they will have 5 + 3 = 8 candies, which is the greatest among the kids.
    - Kid 4, they will have 1 + 3 = 4 candies, which is not the greatest among the kids.
    - Kid 5, they will have 3 + 3 = 6 candies, which is the greatest among the kids.
    

    Example 2:

    Input: candies = [4,2,1,1,2], extraCandies = 1
    Output: [true,false,false,false,false] 
    Explanation: There is only 1 extra candy.
    Kid 1 will always have the greatest number of candies, even if a different kid is given the extra candy.
    

    Example 3:

    Input: candies = [12,1,12], extraCandies = 10
    Output: [true,false,true]
    

      Constraints:

    Solution (Java)

    class Solution {
        public List<Boolean> kidsWithCandies(int[] candies, int extraCandies) {
            int max = 0;
            for (int i : candies) {
                max = Math.max(max, i);
            }
            List<Boolean> result = new ArrayList<>();
            for (int candy : candies) {
                result.add(candy + extraCandies >= max);
            }
            return result;
        }
    }
    

    Explain:

    nope.

    Complexity: