1627. Graph Connectivity With Threshold

Difficulty:
Related Topics:
Similar Questions:

    Problem

    We have n cities labeled from 1 to n. Two different cities with labels x and y are directly connected by a bidirectional road if and only if x and y share a common divisor strictly greater than some threshold. More formally, cities with labels x and y have a road between them if there exists an integer z such that all of the following are true:

    Given the two integers, n and threshold, and an array of queries, you must determine for each queries[i] = [ai, bi] if cities ai and bi are connected directly or indirectly. (i.e. there is some path between them).

    Return **an array *answer*, where *answer.length == queries.length* and answer[i] is true if for the ith query, there is a path between ai and bi, or answer[i] is false if there is no path.**

      Example 1:

    Input: n = 6, threshold = 2, queries = [[1,4],[2,5],[3,6]]
    Output: [false,false,true]
    Explanation: The divisors for each number:
    1:   1
    2:   1, 2
    3:   1, 3
    4:   1, 2, 4
    5:   1, 5
    6:   1, 2, 3, 6
    Using the underlined divisors above the threshold, only cities 3 and 6 share a common divisor, so they are the
    only ones directly connected. The result of each query:
    [1,4]   1 is not connected to 4
    [2,5]   2 is not connected to 5
    [3,6]   3 is connected to 6 through path 3--6
    

    Example 2:

    Input: n = 6, threshold = 0, queries = [[4,5],[3,4],[3,2],[2,6],[1,3]]
    Output: [true,true,true,true,true]
    Explanation: The divisors for each number are the same as the previous example. However, since the threshold is 0,
    all divisors can be used. Since all numbers share 1 as a divisor, all cities are connected.
    

    Example 3:

    Input: n = 5, threshold = 1, queries = [[4,5],[4,5],[3,2],[2,3],[3,4]]
    Output: [false,false,false,false,false]
    Explanation: Only cities 2 and 4 share a common divisor 2 which is strictly greater than the threshold 1, so they are the only ones directly connected.
    Please notice that there can be multiple queries for the same pair of nodes [x, y], and that the query [x, y] is equivalent to the query [y, x].
    

      Constraints:

    Solution

    class Solution {
        public List<Boolean> areConnected(int n, int threshold, int[][] queries) {
            if (n < 1 || queries == null || queries.length == 0) {
                return new ArrayList<>();
            }
            int i;
            int j;
            int k;
            int x;
            DisjointSetUnion set = new DisjointSetUnion(n + 1);
            int edges = queries.length;
            for (i = threshold + 1; i <= n; i++) {
                k = n / i;
                x = i;
                for (j = 2; j <= k; j++) {
                    x = x + i;
                    set.union(i, x);
                }
            }
            List<Boolean> result = new ArrayList<>(edges);
            for (int[] query : queries) {
                result.add(set.find(query[0]) == set.find(query[1]));
            }
            return result;
        }
    
        private static class DisjointSetUnion {
            private final int[] rank;
            private final int[] parent;
    
            public DisjointSetUnion(int n) {
                rank = new int[n];
                parent = new int[n];
                for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
                    this.rank[i] = 1;
                    this.parent[i] = i;
                }
            }
    
            public int find(int u) {
                int x = u;
                while (x != parent[x]) {
                    x = parent[x];
                }
                parent[u] = x;
                return x;
            }
    
            public void union(int u, int v) {
                if (u != v) {
                    int x = find(u);
                    int y = find(v);
                    if (x != y) {
                        if (rank[x] > rank[y]) {
                            rank[x] += rank[y];
                            parent[y] = x;
                        } else {
                            rank[y] += rank[x];
                            parent[x] = y;
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
    

    Explain:

    nope.

    Complexity: